spend management


For several years, I was part of the second wave of the SaaS promise. After Salesforce.com, the first widely successful software-as-a-service platform that became the guiding light of SaaS, several companies tried to transform themselves into a similar solution provider. When the transition was completed, my role at a leading spend management solutions company was to support accounts after the sale was consummated when

At the beginning of the transition from behind-firewall solutions to a on-demand environment, the deployments generated a lot of friction with clients. Among the problems:

1.- Clients didn’t really understand what the software was capable of doing on an on-demand basis. Clients assumed that customizations were simple and readily available. Changes are possible, but within constraints of a multi-tenant environment, although Coupa maybe changing that.
2.- Timelines specified in the SLAs were unrealistic, because they assumed the client clearly understood what they were looking for. Not the case by far.
3.- The promise of the solution was based on a product-based sales cycle, instead of showing how life was going to be for the end user. This created big disconnects between the management at the client, who purchased the solution, and the front line people who were supposed to “just get it” and start using it right away.
4.- Almost all training and documentation were related to the product itself, using terminology that some people calls “gobbledygook” using terms such as flexible, scalable, groundbreaking, industry-standard, cutting-edge and the likes. More on gobbledygook here.
So, the problems were basically people and process related. A solution that didn’t address the particular problems of the front line team was bound for failure from the beginning, not because the selected solution didn’t deliver, it was because the client was not prepared to absorb the extra workload needed to re-train their teams due to misplaced expectations. And expectations management is the role of the sales and marketing team, not the implementation ones.

Conversely, client companies didn’t perform well in their due diligence either. Very rarely I found companies that had a very clear understanding of what was needed, what are the limitations of a SaaS solution or effectively collected input from end-users.

In the last few years, my professional career was centered around making my management and clients happy after the sale. It was a role that verged on advanced diplomacy, in which I had to “twist” statements of work into workable task lists, reselling the entire solution to end-users who where not consulted, creating new processes so clients could make better use of the solutions, etc. That in turn created a big push back from my leadership who were surprised that so much of my consulting time was spent convincing people to deliver information and not implementing the solution itself. The big disconnect was between the promised solution and the actual delivered product, and my task was to make those two converge into a single successful implementation. And then, and only then, the promise of SaaS was fulfilled, but after much pain and bad blood.

Recently, Aberdeen Group released “Spend Analysis: Transforming Data Into Value” [registration required to download]

From the Executive Summary

As dire economic conditions place an unwanted negative backdrop to routine business, spend analysis has risen as a valuable process to the entire enterprise. In fact, 81% of enterprises in our survey for this report cite spend analysis as a high-value option in today’s economy.

I cannot agree more with them. I delivered a seminar on Spend Analysis some months ago at the ISM in Silicon Valley, and I found high interest from the audience. I was lucky enough to be able to speak with one of the attendants few days ago, and he mentioned that his team is currently performing a manual assessment and the results are so astonishing (meaning the discovery of so much waste and maverick spend) that now his team is presenting a preliminary set of findings to the CEO. And the company is one big technology player in the valley, known for sound processes and policies. Imagine what is out here to uncover by performing this sort of analysis. And most importantly, what are the actions after the results are tabulated.

The report is structured as follows:

1.- Benchmarking best in class
2.- Benchmarking requirements for success
3.- Required actions

The report shows a perfect case study to demonstrate how companies save resources by regularly and effectively analyzing their spend and putting it under active management.

Today I had a conversation with an old friend, Bobbi Battista, who now works for Tenzing Consulting as a recruiting manager. While talking with her I realized that we first met in Monterrey, Mexico exactly ten years ago in the summer of 1999 when I was working at a diversified manufacturing corporation as an MBA summer intern in the procurement organization, and she had just arrived to perform an, at that point novel, exercise called “Opportunity Assessment” in order to identify sourcing projects ripe for a “reverse auction”. Both terms were really new and Bobbi’s company FreeMarkets, Inc, was at the center of the revolution in those sourcing techniques.

It is extremely telling that the challenges she faced then in running that exercise are exactly the same now. In the ten years since we first met, I have conducted countless spend assessments, first at FreeMarkets (yes, they hired me right after I finished my MBA, thanks in no small part to Bobbi) and then Ariba after they merged with FreeMarkets in 2004. During those assessments I performed myself at some of the biggest corporations in the world, I found extremely difficult to get the message across that without proper understanding of where the money was going, running a productive sourcing practice was futile. Yes, they were getting savings by using brute force negotiations. But no strategic vision.

In these ten years, I’ve seen companies short changing their sourcing teams by squandering resources, hiring mildly talented managers, and requesting the impossible from a group of hard working spend professionals without giving them proper tools to do their work. It seems almost impossible to believe that the vast majority of companies still use Excel to perform a spend analysis, pretty much the same way as they were doing in 1999. We will never know how many opportunities to save money they relinquished. But I’m sure of one thing: if they had invested in talent and tools since 1999, they could have saved several times more money than any investment in people or tools since then.

Strategic sourcing is and will remain an area of opportunity to save money now and in the near future. Companies will remain uncompetitive if they don’t find ways to be more efficient and cost conscious. But what are they doing? They fire “costly” employees in order to make the numbers for their quarter. They suspend investments in technology because they fear the ROI may not be as high as they expected, etc. I see them spending tens of millions of dollars in an SAP implementation that undoubtedly helps them trace their financials but decline to invest a couple of hundred thousand dollars in sourcing technology. They find hard to believe an ROI of 10 to 1 (and lots of times higher). As many at FreeMarkets and afterwars Ariba realized, the vast majority of the first reverse auction we conducted at any company helped pay for a full year of the underlying technology without doing anything else. If there’s a sure thing in investment, that is a full suite of a spend management solution.

But why after ten years we are still struggling to get the message across? Why do companies still need proof of concept for strategic sourcing? I don’t have an answer, but my guess is that the current generation of procurement leadership still recall their days as buyers relying in telex as a communication tool in the seventies and brute force as a negotiation strategy. They still see procurement as a tactical task instead of a strategic core competency. They wanted “numbers” so they went along the SAP train. They needed predictability so they liked MRP systems making crude demand projections. But they thought nothing about enabling their teams to perform their duties better using similar tools tailored for their practice.

Another problem is talent retention at the sourcing departments. I recall training a team of newly recruited sourcing managers at the Latin American headquarters of a big US corporation. I have very seldom encountered a team so focused, avid for knowledge and with clearer objectives than that. They did wonderful things and became an example to the rest of the organization on how a professional team is recruited, trained and performed. But they were too good for procurement. Their careers started to stagnate because the upper management didn’t create the right incentives to keep them working. Promotions were deemed too expensive. So the new recruits either left the company or asked to be transferred to other areas with better career paths. They were 20 people that were recruited after interviewing more than 300 people! After they left their sourcing positions, the company never replaced them with like talent, because it was “too expensive”. After only 3 years, the sourcing department was back to the same old bullying tactics with the vendors and had a lot of friction with the internal clients. Like nothing happened. All that talent and investment, wasted.

I guess my point is that, after all the above ranting, it seems that Spend Management is NOT a mature practice. Corporations needlessly delay their commitment to a more strategic approach and waste time, money and resources in quick fixes and half measures. And that the ones that invested heavily in the area when a visionary leader saw what needed to be done, lacked the capacity to lock the knowledge and disseminate the goodness of our profession.

In today’s post on Supply Excellence Tim Minahan makes an excellent point about the lack of proper oversight of purchasing practices in the federal government. Imagine the biggest spender in the world NOT having an appointed CPO and a competent team to oversee the expenditure of upwards of 3 trillion dollars. Granted, some lieutenants are in place now, but the team is not complete.

Every company in the world right now is looking into ways to become more efficient in their spend management. There are ways in which they can save money and they are looking furiously into that right now.

But Congress is blocking the nomination of the only persons who can actually help change wasteful practices and at the same time blames the administration of not being efficient in the shedding of taxpayers’ money. What a bad example to spend managers elsewhere. So much talking about saving money for health care but little action in actually saving it.

UPDATE: I just realized that Jason Busch from Spend Matters and Justin Fogarty, Editor of Supply Excellence co-authored the article, which also appears in the Spend Matters blog.

Carlos Ortiz

After some weeks of no posting, I have to share to some news. I just delivered an ISM seminar on Spend Assessment at the Hilton Santa Clara, at the heart of Silicon Valley, to an audience of spend management professionals from world class tech companies. And, caramba, what an eye opener that was. Every single one of them is having a lot of difficulties in understanding their spend. And no good tools to do an even passable work to address their spend visibility woes. Just their relentless manipulation of huge amounts of data and likely a humongous amount of work and pressure to get it done. Kudos to them, the unsung heroes in procurement. I also thought that based on previous cancellations of other seminars organized by the ISM-Silicon Valley, mine was going the same way. I was wrong.

Clearly there is a need for spend analysis solutions out there. What I didn’t know was how unaware people were about the requirements to get the data ready for a manual spend assessment exercise, which was the core of my presentation. Now they know and hopefully are ready to make a case to perform a structured category assessment at their companies and have tools to deliver a successful strategy for managing their spend. I also made clear that, as we, the ones in the trenches who went through such an effort know, that a corporate spend assessment is a gargantuan undertaking if you don’t have the right amount of resources. I emphasized the fact that a one-off manual assessment was OK. But since refreshing the information is NOT an easy task, I recommended looking into an automated solution from the Spend Analysis vendors out there, like the ones here.

The idea of the seminar was to acquaint people with some of the common tasks associated with spend analysis, best practices, terminology and project management. Based on the feedback forms, looks like my delivery was a success. Very encouraging.

So, all in all, a good experience doing the thing that I like the most which is teaching people how to do their job in a better way.

See you soon.

I wish I was working for a start-up, for I will help shape it’s future in a sustainable way without the hassle of dealing with layers of bureaucracy and detailed ROI analysis on the advantages of sustainability. But the hard fact is that I’m not working for a start-up. So instead of doing what I want, I will write about it so others can take a look at my advise.

In previous posts I’ve wrote about business practices for start-ups and also sustainability. Today I want to merge the two streams into one list of ideas, to implement on the design phase of the new venture. To be green and profitable by Design and not by imposition.

1.- Sustainable working environment.
Yes, you can buy a solar panel and put it on the roof of your office or build a super efficient building. But as a start-up you likely can’t. What you can do is check the energy bill of the buildings or office space you are about to lease. Have someone appraise the efficiency of the windows, walls, HVAC systems, lighting, etc. You may be surprised to find that a simple comparison of these may render an otherwise “nice” office a money pit. Remember that commercial buildings are constructed at the lowest possible cost that complies with regulations . The builder doesn’t really care about your energy bill in the future, so be careful when renting your space.

2.- Energy efficient hardware.
Regardless of your trade, you are going to use some sort of equipment for your business. It can be computers, machines, motors, printers and whatnot. The question is, when the team was deciding the specs of the equipment, did anybody build an energy efficiency analysis into the sourcing process? An electric motor can be very efficient, in the range of 95% or more of electricity conversion into mechanical drive. If you instead buy a 90% efficiency motor because it has lower “price”, you are basically planning to spend more cash in the future in the form of the extra electricity used to action the motor. Simple arithmetic using the extra 5% kWh usage for let’s say 10 years projected life of the motor, times the price per kWh, will tell you a horror story of extra costs.
The company can greatly benefit from a Net Present Value analysis of the equipment, including in the equation the maintenance costs and projected energy bill. For more information on energy efficiency in the workplace you can follow the guidelines of the Energy Star program.

3.- Supplier Management for a green relationship.
Have you asked your suppliers if they use sustainable business practices? If so, what was the answer? Only after you know what your suppliers are doing is that you can truly claim your business to be sustainable. Your own island may look “green” but the entire business environment serving your company may not be. A supplier may be producing some exotic component/product/chemical for you that results in massive amounts of pollutants released or that requires complicated and wasteful packaging or handling. Maybe a partnership with vendor can result in a product that is non-polluting and most likely cheaper.
Are the vendors solely selected on price concerns? Have you analyzed other solutions with more “expensive” vendors and see if they have a lower TCO and more sustainable alternative? Are you pressing your vendors to reduce packaging/energy use/toxic chemical use in the products or services you buy from them?
These and other questions must be asked before you sign that procurement contract. You want a partner for the long term.

4.- Corporate Vision.
None of the above happens without clear corporate vision. A one line statement issued by the CEO can work marvels down the ladder. Just saying “We will have a goal of zero waste for producing this widget within 3 years” will focus everybody into making the widget more effectively. And since waste is equivalent to throwing money down the drain, having zero waste therefore renders the business more profitable by default. In procurement, zero waste could mean an automated purchasing process that everybody understands and uses effectively, sourcing for long term value, tracking spend accurately, measure performance and drive for constant improvement.

These are very basic ideas on how to improve your bottom line By Design and by using procurement as one of the cornerstones of your sustainable business. If you embed sustainable procurement practices from the beginning, your business has much better chances of success while reducing waste and increasing the bottom line.

Carlos Ortiz

Today, Michael Lamoreaux, A.K.A. “the doctor”, editor of the very insightful Sourcing Innovation blog, posted a review of an article originally published by the Supply Chain Management Review. In his analysis, he presents us with a wealth of information and recommendations to keep cash in tight control and incidentally touches some of the same points I made in my last two posts on Spend Management for start-ups here and here. More specifically, he summarizes some ten different tasks and strategies to get control over spending the hard earned cash. Start-ups can benefit immensely from reading either Michael’s blog or the original article.

Carlos Ortiz

Following to my Part 1 of my series on Start-ups, here are some suggestions on how to use Spend Management techniques and processes to help new companies reap the benefits of the latest practices. Spend Management is one part the mandatory holistic approach to making your business successful, and that approach is not less valid in start-ups. Resources are scarce, and here I explain some techniques to help you conserve them.

1.- Understand your spend.
See if the one or more of the following statements is true:
- I don’t know if I’m paying too much for rent, bandwidth, furniture third-party services, recruiting, etc. compared to what the market is offering.
- I don’t know the total cost of including a new employee in the payroll.
- My projected spend in some or all the spend categories is unknown
- I have never heard the term “strategic sourcing”
- I consistently spend more in services than what was originally budgeted.
- I don’t have time to track all the invoices and match them with the corresponding PO.

If you answer is yes to any one of these statements, then it is likely that you don’t have control of your spend. A relatively simple exercise listing all your invoices and organizing them by category and vendor, for a period of one year, will tell you a very interesting story. Compare total cost per vendor/spend category vs. the original budget. You’ll be surprised. Some categories you thought didn’t exist when you created your business plan are likely to be a significant portion of you total spend.

Equally important to know where the money was spent is where is it going to go. You can create what-if scenarios for low, medium or high volume sales and see what could be the future demands on your company resources. Build those scenarios in your contracts with vendors so you can get discounts on volume if your best estimate becomes a reality, or conversely, secure a price for a year or more if sales are sluggish.

2.- Time-to-market.
Your product needs to reach the market, but “boring” administrative tasks are using so much of you valuable time. Turns out that a lot of start up companies make the common mistake to underestimate the time commitment to make the business successful. You can save countless hours by having a clear strategy and process when it comes to purchasing. You can do one or several of the following:

- Hire a resource who solely focuses on purchasing and spend management. This person must be brought with compensation based on equity, so he or she shares the burden and the vision.
- Devise a spend management strategy that drives an efficient PROCESS. This is the key element of the entire initiative. If you don’t know how to do it, then hire an industry expert for a few weeks to help you, so you are ready faster than your competitors.
- Ask your vendors to show how fast they can implement, deploy or deliver their goods or services. The fastest one should get the deal, even if it is slightly more expensive than the best offer. In the end you save money.
- Look for risk-sharing partnerships with some strategic vendors. This may not be to the liking of the founders, but it can save a great deal of cash and time. Cisco may not want to partner with you, but a third-party reseller, being a smaller company, may be the perfect one to manage your server farm. You focus on programming, and they do their own thing with the servers.

Remember, the more time you have in your hands, more time you can dedicate to sell your idea or product.

3.- Strategic alignment
Your purchasing practice MUST be aligned with the overall company objective. For example, if your start-up will consume vast amounts of bandwidth, the focus should be in getting the best possible deal from a telecom vendor. You VC or angel investor may have contacts in the industry who can help you find the best deal. More importantly, make the local telecom vendor pool compete for your business. That is just one example. There other areas in which you can leverage your contacts to make the business more successful.

You can build your purchasing strategy by analyzing the following:

- List your current spend by category and make a projection for 6,9 and 12 months. This will tell you where your money will go and the areas in which you are likely to need help.
- Research the market for the top categories. Is time well invested and you may find vendors with better ideas that can help you save money.
- Define your procurement objective clearly. Is it time to market? Cost savings? If you know what you need, your purchases will have to comply with the vision and company strategy
- Devise metrics to track your goal attainment. No metric, no management.
- Implement a basic technology implementation roadmap for procurement. You may have a set of Excel spreadsheets to track everything, but at some point you will have to make the transition to a more robust platform. Be sure that when that transition comes, you have the right data to make the transition.

4.- Building your infrastructure for growth
Another common mistake is not to have the proper infrastructure in place. And by infrastructure I mean not only computers or office space. I ‘m talking about mail services, janitors, HVAC maintenance, telecom, security, recruiting, accounting, payroll, PR, investor relations, etc. Finding and implementing vendors in those areas can be overwhelming and distracting, but most if not all of them can be outsourced. With the right strategy you can build a pipeline of projects that identify the right vendors at the right price so they take over those tasks. Any investment in those outsourced services are money well invested and it is also the way big corporations manage their core businesses.

These are a few ideas on how, by implementing a Spend Management practice, you can save cash and time, the two most precious resources in your search for success.

Start-ups face a unique set of challenges when it relates to the balancing of time and resource management. On one side, they are likely to be cash strapped and in a race to get their product or service to the market and generate cash flow. On the other, they need to manage their day-to-day operation, namely dealing with vendors, paying bills, meeting with VC firms and all the other ancillary tasks to run an operation.

The first part, getting a product or service to market, is their primary task and likely the main area of expertise of the founders and initial pool of employees. But sometimes this initial team lacks the resources or knowledge to make the day-to-day operation an efficient one. Among the administrative tasks that are usually neglected are the ones related to spend management. This articles focuses on the common mistakes made by small enterprises around spend management and some steps and techniques on how to avoid them. Also, we will make the point that a company that avoids those mistakes is in much better position to make a better impression to outside investors by showing it’s commitment to be the best-in-class in every area, including non-core activities, therefore rendering their business case a much more robust one.

Definition of Spend Management

Before we define the practice of Spend Management (or variations of the term) for the purposes of this article, let’s review what the leaders in the area have to say.

1.- Institute for Supply Management [ISM]
“ Supply Management is the identification, acquisition, access, positioning, and management of resources the organization needs or potentially needs in the attainment of its strategic objectives. Other key components of supply management are disposition, distribution, inventory control, logistics, materials management, packaging, product or service development, procurement, quality management, receiving, transportation and shipping, and warehousing.

2.- Ariba, Inc. Leader in Spend Management Solutions [Link]
“Spend Management aligns organizations, processes, and systems to analyze, source, contract, procure, pay, manage and continuously improve global supply for best-value performance in support of the strategic objectives of the business.”

3.- AMR Research
“Spend that is currently under control or management. Control includes the use of structured events (RFX, auctions), contract management, preferred suppliers with active supplier development programs, and spend analysis/visibility involving spend data management and the use of third-party content.” This definition was provided by Lora Cecere to Jason Busch of SpendMatters blog.

These definitions are substantially different, going from the strategic approach from the ISM to almost entirely tactical from Lora Cecere. I really like the one from the ISM, as it really puts into perspective the fact that all organizations must have a spend management practice in order to be successful, and that’s the one we are going to dissect.

With this definition cleared, now we can start to translate it into practical steps and techniques that a start-up can actually use in order to avoid waste and save scarce resources. Please check The Sourcing Post tomorrow for the second and final part in the series.

Following today’s coverage on the ISM 2009 Conference, I read a brief note at Purchasing.com that explains what United Airlines has been doing for the last two years to improve their sourcing practice. It boils down to this:

1.- Creation of multidisciplinary teams with people from sourcing, finance, commodity management and market experts, although they use some other nomenclature to define the roles.
2.- Communication strategy
3.- Clear definition of roles and responsibilities
4.- Standardization of sourcing process into four steps
5.- Supplier feedback

Well, turns out those are pretty basic steps to run a sourcing program at any company. The fact that United was not using that strategic approach suggests that companies are still a long way from having a fully implemented strategic sourcing practice.

On the other hand, we have to give credit to Grace Puma, United’s CPO who started the whole thing at United 2 years ago. I bet she was surprised to know that the most basic strategies and processes for strategic sourcing had not been common practice.

[Full article here]

Next Page »